Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2009 In Review)
Seeing huge swings in your account value? On margin? Read my "Come to Jesus" Ticker? If not, please do. Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
See The Federationists on their new web site and forum.
Donate to obtain GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. Interested in T-Shirts, caps and coffee mugs? Click here.
RSS available
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in Ticker User: Not logged on

Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout

Showing Page 1 of 4  First1234Last
User Info You Can't Possibly Be Serious (CRE) in forum [Ticker]
Genesis
Posts: 71412
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
KD^2
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List Ignore this thread
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1562-Y....

----------
"The monetary base in ALL modern monetary systems is the sum of unencumbered assets against which one is both WILLING AND ABLE to borrow." - Me
2009-10-31 10:06:21
Permalink
Richv
Posts: 15
Incept: 2009-05-24
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
They are trying to fix the cracks in the dam with paper mache to forestall the flood. Buying a few months time with hundreds of billions of our $$.

2009-10-31 10:15:23
Permalink
Krzelune
Posts: 2078
Incept: 2007-10-08

DFW
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
That guy that only owes 5 million has an unfair advantage so the other guy deserves some affirmative economic action.

At this point I wouldn't be surprised at anything this govt does trying to tweak here and tweak there in an attempt to influence behavior and of course totally skewing any resemblance to a natural economic order of things.

2009-10-31 10:15:27
Permalink
Swingtrader
Posts: 5891
Incept: 2007-08-12

United Oligarchic Goldman Sachs States of America
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Yep.

Will probably push it somewhat further out, as leases expire.

As leases roll forward, they will be replaced with leases for less.

That is making the assumption that the lease will actually roll forward, whereas in many cases the lease will go "poof" when the tenant goes "poof"

----------
Janet Tavakoli wrote..
...greater risk for deflationary collapse than before... Whether we get deflationary collapse followed by inflation or just move straight to inflation, the economy is guaranteed more pain.


2009-10-31 10:15:56
Permalink
Bozonian
Posts: 14033
Incept: 2007-09-01

PFT - Pure F'n Tin
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
As usual, Karl is 6 months to a year ahead of the game while Congress and the Fed are 6 months to a year behind it.

----------
I'm so depressed about outsourcing I called the suicide hotline and got a call center in Pakistan. They got all excited and asked me if I could drive a truck.

Everything I write is my opinion and not to be considered proven fact. Nothing I write should be considered financial advice.
2009-10-31 10:18:02
Permalink
Truesincerity
Posts: 590
Incept: 2008-03-07
Virginia
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The FED is turning its back and basically telling the banks do what you have to do with our blessings. Extend and Pretend baby, until we can get thru this.

----------
Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself.
2009-10-31 10:25:10
Permalink
Etz3l
Posts: 9103
Incept: 2007-06-26

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Think of a can that gets heavier everytime you kick it.

At some point you're just gonna fracture your toes.

----------
Treating the symptoms of financial corruption isn’t the same as removing the causes.

2009-10-31 10:30:00
Permalink
Wendya
Posts: 26
Incept: 2009-06-02
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
A couple of Zero Hedge links for thought...

Is Fed Abandoning Bailout Of Commercial Real Estate [http://www.zerohedge.com/article/fed-aba....]
<blockquote>
The other implication is that firms with CRE exposure can no longer rely on the Fed as a perpetual guarantor of risky exposure. Not only that, but in adopting a new policy strategy, the Fed is acknowledging the major problem that CRE writedowns will represent for banks, yet is telling banks to resolve problems on their own, while subsequently they will "not be subject to criticism for engaging in these efforts."

The implications of this Fed action for the economy could be staggering as the $3.5 b,quadr,trillion CRE market will likely not receive the same largesse that residential real estate has been the recipient of ever since the conservatorship of the GSEs. And the biggest loser in all of this will be banks that still have not used the massive risk rally to offload whole loan and CMBS CRE holdings, and moreover, still have these marked at par or close thereby.
</blockquote>

Also: Wilbur Ross: "The Beginning Of A Huge Crash In Commercial Real Estate" [http://www.zerohedge.com/article/wilbur-....]

2009-10-31 10:34:53
Permalink
Henderson1
Posts: 639
Incept: 2007-08-09

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
First of all, I see no downside in the CRE operator doing a 'workout' with the lender. After that, however, what possible business advantage would the CRE operator have in paying above-market prices for his commercial space?

This has redefault and FPD written all over.

It does buy the banks a few months but the piper will still be paid.

2009-10-31 10:36:36
Permalink
Ponzi_unit
Posts: 4439
Incept: 2007-09-05
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
If I'm a municipality is it now in my interest to pass commercial zoning anywhere and everywhere?

2009-10-31 10:50:42
Permalink
Markytom
Posts: 217
Incept: 2009-02-19
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
It's all part of the "immaculate recovery" belief where they all hope that prices magically return to 2006/2007 bubble levels. Just trying to buy a little more time. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and the government is truly desperate (and rather delusional to boot).

Chances of the immaculate recovery are essentially zero.

It will all end in tears.

2009-10-31 11:03:29
Permalink
Dji
Posts: 720
Incept: 2009-04-21

Fleming Island
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Gen all tickers like this should refer people to the ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL ticker
We are way beyond Enron Book cooking now. WTF

----------
What goes up Must come Down- Alan Parsons Project
THE TRUTH HURTS! -Dji
2009-10-31 11:05:52
Permalink
9pin
Posts: 2077
Incept: 2009-01-04

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Henderson1 +1, ... To me, the big news here is the indirect message.. FED backstops which were done for AIG, GS, JPM, BoA, C, GMAC, GE, GM, Freddie and Fannie, ... will not be there for CRE. Your on your own, manage your risk.

Also, importantly, now that the FED has actually taken a position, e.g., no punch bowl here, I'd actually expect the CRE mess to actually begin resolving.. where it had been in a major holding pattern, waiting for help. So, if you were a "prudent" Banker facing solvency due to CRE, what would you do. I'd say, it (CRE) gets worse before it gets better, but this is the path if 'getting better' is still a possibility.

----------
playing in-front of trains is risky/resistance and lines are crayons/herds but for turns/real diamonds cut glass/..again, there is no edge in what everyone knows.
2009-10-31 11:14:36
Permalink
Henderson1
Posts: 639
Incept: 2007-08-09

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Yep, when a guy who drives a nuclear-powered printing press offers 'to look the other way' and nothing else, a little more time is all you're getting.


2009-10-31 11:29:55
Permalink
Realist
Posts: 95
Incept: 2009-07-14
Pennsylvania
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
How long can these games and frauds continue?


-------------------------------------------------
A trillion here, a trillion there and pretty soon you're talking about real money

*************************************
Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.

- Kenneth Boulding, economist


2009-10-31 11:32:22
Permalink
Genesis
Posts: 71412
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
KD^2
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Until the cash flow is insufficient.

That day is arriving, here and now.

Slowly, at the periphery so far, but it is happening.

----------
"The monetary base in ALL modern monetary systems is the sum of unencumbered assets against which one is both WILLING AND ABLE to borrow." - Me
2009-10-31 11:34:04
Permalink
Koolaid
Posts: 3171
Incept: 2007-07-23

Atlanta
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Won't the Fed just keep printing and covering up for the lack of cashflows? Maybe not for the little banks, but certainly for the TBTF guys. I don't expect they'll be as forthcoming about it as the prior QE efforts, but I just can't see any scenario in which they don't try to cover things up behind the scenes (and off the "books").

2009-10-31 11:49:31
Permalink
Skybluepink
Posts: 235
Incept: 2007-10-20

RI
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Speaking of cashflows, is this a desperate attempt to allow the banks to hold onto loans that still have cash flow & damn the consequences when they blow up later? This is getting scarier by the day.

2009-10-31 12:06:17
Permalink
Doctorbob
Posts: 812
Incept: 2009-06-03
Gusher of black gold
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
The Government agencies want things to look good. They want to instill confidence in the proletarian masses.

Bank A holds the refinanced $10 million loan. Bank A did what the Pigmen wanted and lost nothing. If fact, it got rid of a shaky note and now has a “performing” note. It went from a troubled bank to an untroubled bank. Everyone is happy, except Karl, Bob, and a few other throwbacks.

Bank B foreclosed and lost $5m in equity. It is now a shaky bank, naked before all. No one is happy.

Alchemist Michael Milken created a world where junk bonds were gold, because he created the perception that the yield and the discount outweighed the risk. And if you did not believe him, he or one of his super-salesmen would call you and would schmooze you until you changed your perception.

When junk bonds collapsed, the pigmen came up with new schemes, like credit default swaps. Junk bonds and CDS are the same thing, snake oil relabeled as Indian remedy.

Oh, and Milken’s bonus for one year, way back in the 1980s? $500m (as I recall). Sound familiar? Drexel didn’t give a damn how Milken made money, only that he did.

“People” like Bernanke really believe that perception is reality. Their view may seem irrational. But they rule the U.S. No one can challenge them.

2009-10-31 12:16:32
Permalink
Pauperbear
Posts: 1406
Incept: 2008-01-22

norwalk, ct
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
hair-brained scheme


should be harebrained scheme

----------
The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.
Winston Churchill

2009-10-31 12:16:49
Permalink
Ilikecoffee
Posts: 1019
Incept: 2008-04-17

cold , AK
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Another fine example of Krudblows free market capitalism. What is free in this example and who is benefitting the most?

----------
You can trust the government, ask any American Indian.

"When people lose everything and they have nothing left to lose, they lose it" Gerald Celente
2009-10-31 12:29:01
Permalink
Jazen
Posts: 1509
Incept: 2007-07-17

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Karl
Correct me if I am wrong or misunderstood, but someone has to eat that 5 million then. If this is the case, why would any bank in their right mind float a CRE loan in the future (most of these are coming due for a rollover in the next 2 years) to anyone? If they know that someone is going to get left standing when the music stops?

----------
Y'all smoke this **** to escape reality?
Me, I don't need this ****.
I am reality.

2009-10-31 12:37:07
Permalink
Yermawm
Posts: 91
Incept: 2009-04-20
SoCal
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
You just can't make this sh!t up!!!

> than 100% LTV on depreciating assets? This cannot work.

Potential takeaways:

A) The $ really means nothing as a unit of account so pay what you like.
B) We will mop this up with further liquidity to make loans whole again. Despite the Fed's rhetoric.

..Or is this a trap to consolidate properties into fewer hands? Too tin?

----------
Hide the decline. The new math.
2009-10-31 12:49:06
Permalink
Shioda
Posts: 50
Incept: 2009-02-21

Newport Beach
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I know California National Bank had several commercial loans that were not in default but the loan came due and the owner could not get refinancing because the property would not appraise. What should be done in that situation?

----------
Let the stupid bird fly first - Old Chinese Proverb
2009-10-31 12:51:50
Permalink
Eaglewwit
Posts: 1889
Incept: 2007-11-30
SoCal
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Where is the FDIC going get all this money. So I guess we can expect to see the recovery rates going down on the FDIC banks now.

----------
"Not even I imagined we would see trillions of dollars being created and given to the culprits as a means of allegedly "saving" the system. This is not mere Keynesianism; it is Keynesianism on steroids and crystal meth."
2009-10-31 12:54:27
Permalink
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel Logout
Showing Page 1 of 4  First1234Last

AKCS V12.1 Copyright 1993-2010 Karl Denninger. All Rights Reserved
Email the AKCS Owner