Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2009 In Review)
Seeing huge swings in your account value? On margin? Read my "Come to Jesus" Ticker? If not, please do. Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
See The Federationists on their new web site and forum.
Donate to obtain GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. Interested in T-Shirts, caps and coffee mugs? Click here.
RSS available
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in Ticker User: Not logged on

Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout

Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last
User Info Recovery? How, Given THIS? in forum [Ticker]
Genesis
Posts: 71431
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
KD^2
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List Ignore this thread
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1535-R....

----------
"The monetary base in ALL modern monetary systems is the sum of unencumbered assets against which one is both WILLING AND ABLE to borrow." - Me
2009-10-22 18:06:29
Permalink
Moniteyes
Posts: 2400
Incept: 2008-11-28
ny
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Another reason to pay the entire balance in 20 days each month.

----------



2009-10-22 18:14:23
Permalink
Mangoelvis
Posts: 250
Incept: 2009-07-11

Las Vegas, NV
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
So what happens when all their good customers transfer their accounts to small banks and credit unions....and their "bad" customers just stop paying and default?????? More bailouts????

----------
A Venus Fly Trap is one of the only organisms that can be cannibalistic and vegetarian at the same time.
2009-10-22 18:17:17
Permalink
Xorbe
Posts: 41
Incept: 2009-06-23
Bay Area, CA
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
"Interest back", what a term! I love it.

2009-10-22 18:22:47
Permalink
Abn0rmal
Posts: 2320
Incept: 2009-01-10
A True American Patriot!
DFW
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Even credit unions are doing this.

I found out about a week ago that my 7.9% credit card will become a 17.9% credit card as of January.

At least they gave me the option to opt out of the new rate by closing the account and paying it off at the existing rate.

2009-10-22 18:25:04
Permalink
Lowcarb
Posts: 80
Incept: 2009-06-30

The Real Bay Area
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This whole thing has become 2-tier: good credit users who can get good interest rates because they actually pay their obligations and bad credit risks who can only get a high-interest cc because they can't qualify for anything else.

Card users who use PenFed or other reputable institution's credit card will be viewed as a responsible credit user and those who use BofA/Citi/Chase cc will be viewed as an irresponsible credit user.

Its come down to that.

Sort of like which side of the train tracks do you live.....which credit card do you carry.

Can I say this: a PenFed card is the new Amex Black Card....

2009-10-22 18:29:10
Permalink
Lowcarb
Posts: 80
Incept: 2009-06-30

The Real Bay Area
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Jbyer: check out PenFed. They recently had a special promotion of a 4.9 percent interest rate for new cc accounts.

I think that window has closed, but you could call them and see if they have any specials coming up.

Right now they have some sort of special offer on new auto loans for 3.99 percent.

https://www.penfed.org

Last modified: 2009-10-22 18:34:59 by lowcarb
Reason: typos

2009-10-22 18:34:15
Permalink
Blackmane
Posts: 69
Incept: 2008-03-07

Rocklin
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
If the previous interest rate on those cards was around 20% and is now 29%, the average family with a balance (about 44% of all households) was paying $3,600 in interest charges previously, but now will be paying $5,220, and increase of $1,620 a year or $135.00 a month.

There are approximately 116 million households in the US. As a consequence the decrease in disposable personal income attributable to this sort of interest rate change is approximately $187,900,000,000 a year, or $187 billion dollars.


After checking the numbers again, wouldn't the final hit to disposable income be $82.6 billion, not $187 billion? Because you don't use all households in the number to calculate the per household hit, but just the households carrying a balance. (116 million households * 44% balance carrying households)

Or did I miss something?

Last modified: 2009-10-22 18:38:05 by blackmane
Reason: added parenthesis

2009-10-22 18:36:44
Permalink
Abn0rmal
Posts: 2320
Incept: 2009-01-10
A True American Patriot!
DFW
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
check out PenFed. They recently had a special promotion of a 4.9 percent interest rate for new cc accounts.
Canceling the account doesn't actually change any aspect of my spending behavior. I've already stopped using it and am just paying it off at the existing interest rate. It's just annoying to get that kind of a letter after years of good behavior.

Last modified: 2009-10-23 07:12:18 by jbyer

2009-10-22 18:42:19
Permalink
Slyace
Posts: 1061
Incept: 2007-10-02

Dallas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Even at 20%, there is no way the vast majority would ever be able to climb out of the hole. Whatever caused them to have credit card debt in the first place (spending more than they make) would prevent them from paying off the debt EVEN AT a reasonable rate.

I assume they are only doing this to customers who carry balances. I use Citi for both personal and business because of the miles. Frankly, now that I think about it, even if they increased my rate to 30% I would still use them because I never carry a balance.

I noticed the other day that my Citi work card has a credit limit of something like 60k and a cash advance limit of more than 40k, both with pretty high rates (maybe 18% and 22%). In my opinion, having these limits is extremely stupid on Citi's part because the ONLY scenario under which they would get used is where the customer is about to go under. My monthly business charges average 5-6k and have probably never gone over 12k, so why would they give me 60k in credit?

2009-10-22 18:43:41
Permalink
Bicycle
Posts: 685
Incept: 2008-09-05
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List

----------
The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akVL7QY0S....

the government comes for the regular people first http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFY0HBkUm....
2009-10-22 18:45:22
Permalink
Future_shock
Posts: 1141
Incept: 2007-10-16

Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Why doesn't the FED buy some credit card securities? Why focus just on mortgages?

2009-10-22 18:50:32
Permalink
Arrack979
Posts: 1271
Incept: 2008-07-15

Blue State Hell
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Just wait till this **** hits the mortgage market.

BOOM!!!

Game over.

----------
Cash IS a position, just like fetal and reverse cowgirl
2009-10-22 18:51:05
Permalink
Genesis
Posts: 71431
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
KD^2
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tanks for the catch on the GDP number - the first one (interest only) missed a divisor, but the "total impact" figure did not.

----------
"The monetary base in ALL modern monetary systems is the sum of unencumbered assets against which one is both WILLING AND ABLE to borrow." - Me
2009-10-22 18:57:50
Permalink
Jstanley01
Posts: 2571
Incept: 2008-07-30
A True American Patriot!
San Antonio, Texas
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Revolving credit has always been a scam. The only thing the pigmen are loaning you money for is your first purchases, up to your limit. Afterwards you're forking over money to them, to keep your balance in check, which you would have otherwise had in your back pocket to make your followup purchases WITHOUT INTEREST. Welcome to the debt slavery game. You don't have to pay if you don't play.

----------
...so in short, my fellow Texans, we must secede. "For the children..." --Me
2009-10-22 19:05:17
Permalink
Steelhead23
Posts: 388
Incept: 2008-09-09
Portland OR
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Ho-Ho-Ho Merry Christmas, Merry Christmas. There's going to be a lot of coal in the stockings this Christmas. This is gonna kill retail - dead as a doornail. Oh, and that 8.9% growth in China? It's coal for them too. On Dancer. On Prancer .... Dash away, dash away home.

----------
short em all - let God sort em out!
2009-10-22 19:09:51
Permalink
Financeguy
Posts: 4946
Incept: 2007-08-10

Charlotte
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
What ever happened to usury laws? How nostalgic....

----------
"Granted, if you are not into Barbara Streisand and creme brulee, South Beach could be a tad lonely." Eleua
2009-10-22 19:16:15
Permalink
Arw
Posts: 68
Incept: 2009-03-02
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
"Dear John,"

Did you make that up?

2009-10-22 19:17:40
Permalink
Cjworkman
Posts: 5615
Incept: 2007-08-22

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Karl,

Look at COF's report;

70% of their revenue came from CC's. Mostly from increased gross margins on them. Most likely from the same thing Citi is doing.

At the same time though,... Credit card deliquencies rose 54 basis points in one quarter. From 4.99% to 5.53% in 3 months..

That's likely to only compound as more interest piles up on new charges.

----------
Ben is going to create an equity bubble from excess liquidity that tops at 1200... and bottoms at 300. A bubble inside of bearish economic conditions, so that it never reaches new market highs and crashes far below the lows. - me
2009-10-22 19:17:57
Permalink
Arw
Posts: 68
Incept: 2009-03-02
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
From the wiki (use at your own risk)...

"Each U.S. state has its own statute which dictates how much interest can be charged before it is considered usurious or unlawful.
If a lender charges above the lawful interest rate, a court will not allow the lender to sue to recover the debt because the interest rate was illegal anyway. In some states (such as New York) such loans are voided ab-initio[21]
However, there are separate rules applied to most banks. The U.S. Supreme Court held unanimously in the 1978 Marquette Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp. case that the National Banking Act of 1863 allowed nationally chartered banks to charge the legal rate of interest in their state regardless of the borrower's state of residence.[22] In 1980, due to inflation, Congress passed the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act exempting federally chartered savings banks, installment plan sellers and chartered loan companies from state usury limits. This effectively overrode all state and local usury laws.[23][24] The 1968 Truth in Lending Act does not regulate rates, except in the cases of some mortgages, but it does require uniform or standardized disclosure of costs and charges.[25]"

2009-10-22 19:22:14
Permalink
Dji
Posts: 720
Incept: 2009-04-21

Fleming Island
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
More proof the TBTF big Banksters are insolvent . Can we now call them worse than the MOB?

----------
What goes up Must come Down- Alan Parsons Project
THE TRUTH HURTS! -Dji
2009-10-22 19:23:48
Permalink
Ralf
Posts: 49
Incept: 2009-07-11
USA
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I don't understand the argument that GDP will contract because of the increase in interest being paid. The money is going into the hands of the banks - it isn't disappearing. How that money gets spent will determine it's effect on the GDP. Certain sectors will contract while others may expand. I don't disagree that it will have a disruptive effect on the economy.

2009-10-22 19:24:31
Permalink
T!
Posts: 36
Incept: 2007-12-03
Nevada
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I got two of these letters from citibank yesterday on my credit cards. I have two of their cards with really small balances. prior interest rate was 13.9%- same letter saying its going to 29.9. i have had these cards for many, many years. they rarely have much of a balance and are always paid on time. when i called to opt out, I explained that the loan shark down the street (guido is his name, i think) gave me a better rate... they told me it's because it costs them more for money...lol (oh, they did say they were sorry to lose me as a customer)

2009-10-22 19:26:13
Permalink
Jstanley01
Posts: 2571
Incept: 2008-07-30
A True American Patriot!
San Antonio, Texas
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
The 1968 Truth in Lending Act does not regulate rates, except in the cases of some mortgages, but it does require uniform or standardized disclosure of costs and charges.
Gee Barbie. You mean you didn't read your credit card agreement?


----------
...so in short, my fellow Texans, we must secede. "For the children..." --Me
2009-10-22 19:26:34
Permalink
Fred_flintstone
Posts: 5128
Incept: 2008-04-15

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
A lot of this is prompted by the new credit card laws that went into effect in May. Because banks are more strictly regulated in how and when they can charge fees, raise rates, etc., they are basically slashing risk by cutting back open lines, and jacking rates in advance as high as they can within the framework of the new regs. Perfect example of Congress + banks in action, net result consumer is screwed. Here is a guide to the new laws:

http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-n....

The way I think if it is, previously banks extended way too much credit to high risk people, but made it up on late fees, surprise rate increases, etc. Now with tighter regs and even higher default rates, they are methodically doing what they have to do to maintain profit margins.

I personally never carry a monthly balance and would advise others to do so only under dire circumstances. And if those circumstances were dire enough I'd just run up the highest balance possible and default. They are in fact increasing the likelihood people do exactly this with these usurious policies. I mean **** these people.

Last modified: 2009-10-22 19:28:52 by fred_flintstone

2009-10-22 19:26:54
Permalink
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel Logout
Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last

AKCS V12.1 Copyright 1993-2010 Karl Denninger. All Rights Reserved
Email the AKCS Owner