Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2009 In Review)
Seeing huge swings in your account value? On margin? Read my "Come to Jesus" Ticker? If not, please do. Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
See The Federationists on their new web site and forum.
Donate to obtain GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. Interested in T-Shirts, caps and coffee mugs? Click here.
RSS available
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in Ticker User: Not logged on

Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout

Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last
User Info Monday's Reverse Repo Test? in forum [Ticker]
Genesis
Posts: 71432
Incept: 2007-06-26
A True American Patriot!
KD^2
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List Ignore this thread
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1530-M....

----------
"The monetary base in ALL modern monetary systems is the sum of unencumbered assets against which one is both WILLING AND ABLE to borrow." - Me
2009-10-21 10:58:42
Permalink
Macneib
Posts: 2864
Incept: 2008-01-19

ROK, but I'd rather be back on Boracay,
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Wait, are you guys suggesting there are no brakes on this thing???

EDIT: Karl you're doing excellent work. I don't think people can thank you enough for your tireless efforts.




Last modified: 2009-10-21 11:14:31 by macneib

2009-10-21 11:06:52
Permalink
Clumsygardener
Posts: 57
Incept: 2009-07-17
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
I don't think people can thank you enough for your tireless efforts.
I know I can't.

2009-10-21 11:10:04
Permalink
Statusquojoe
Posts: 2397
Incept: 2008-11-20
A True American Patriot!
Land of the fees Home of the slaves.
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Wow, they are over leveraged by a ratio of 33:1 if those figures are accurate (I don't doubt your information Karl, I am suspect of Chase's reported cash reserves.

----------
"In short, you are the definition of moral hazard." Senator Bunning to Bernanke
2009-10-21 11:23:08
Permalink
Fortune
Posts: 1455
Incept: 2008-04-21
A deep dark place...scary
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I asked that exact same question; are they really this dumb. The answer is irrefutably "Yes, they are". They have listened to their own BS now for so long, drank their own kool-aid for so long, that they are now fully deluded into believing their own BS. To think the PDs had available these funds after all we know and have discovered is beyond comprehension. Am shocked.

----------
It's a toss up.
It is the Rule of Law that transforms assets into money: Martin Armstrong
Math IS: Karl Denninger

2009-10-21 11:23:09
Permalink
Bananamerican
Posts: 853
Incept: 2009-05-28
Anytown U.S.A.
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Gen, that ticker was pretty skimpy...too much teasing and a bit too cryptic for the peanut gallery...can you flesh it out? Implications?

----------
This is not capitalism. This is not American. This is crime.
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks." Lord Acton

Last modified: 2009-10-21 11:28:09 by bananamerican

2009-10-21 11:26:29
Permalink
Macneib
Posts: 2864
Incept: 2008-01-19

ROK, but I'd rather be back on Boracay,
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Banana,
We're lucky enough to even get a rumor that there are table scraps on items like this. This is primarily off of ZH's site so I suggest taking a peek over there if you are looking for more speculation.

2009-10-21 11:30:29
Permalink
Eli
Posts: 3844
Incept: 2007-09-10
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This sounds like a potential run of MM could commence, since it is the only place the Fed can turn to.

2009-10-21 11:42:58
Permalink
Snowman
Posts: 1040
Incept: 2009-03-09

avoiding yellow snow
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Even the Fed knows the PD's can't come up with the money, so it is time for a hail mary pass to the money market funds. Do I hear calls being made to Fidelity and Schwab?

From the FT:http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e313ceb8-a885-....

The obvious counterparties for reverse repo deals are the Wall Street primary dealers. However, the Fed thinks they would only have balance sheet capacity to refinance about $100bn of assets. By contrast, the money-market funds have $2,500bn in assets, which means they could plausibly refinance as much as $500bn in Fed assets. Officials think there would be appetite on the part of the funds, which are under pressure from regulators and investors to stick to low-risk liquid investments.


2009-10-21 11:46:03
Permalink
Future_shock
Posts: 1143
Incept: 2007-10-16

Texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Well then some of the MMFs are going to get stuffed with Fed garbage? Who the hell wants to be the lucky fund?

2009-10-21 11:46:27
Permalink
Eli
Posts: 3844
Incept: 2007-09-10
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Dear Lord, the PD's want nothing to do with the **** sandwiches they have off loaded, so the FED is going to feed them into the money markets probably by force.

Contaminating the value of MMs and reducing liquidity in area that could bring down the remaining productive companies of this nation. Because the failed banks are still a big fail.

2009-10-21 12:00:46
Permalink
Lucky1
Posts: 64
Incept: 2009-08-05

Pittsburgh
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Rut-roh.

Banana: To me, this means JP Morgan/Chase is at the end of their money rope; FDIC can't even resolve your local neighborhood lemon-aid stand at this point since they're flat busted; and the other posters on this board so far are right - the only other pool of available *real* funds left at this point even close to large enough to bridge the abyss are the Money Markets.

Money Markets that consider parting with their investors cash here for this purpose should first consider whether this is wise...of course, the MMF Managers may just get Ken Lewise'd by Ben and Tim to convince them to participate...

Might there be a quick downdraft in the stock market to rapidly increase inflows to MMF's to provide the necessary funding????

Gosh, Karl, you've made this cynic even more cynical, if that's even possible...

----------
"Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy."
-USSC Justice Louis D. Brandeis: Dissenting Opinion in "Olmstead v. United States" (1928)
2009-10-21 12:05:30
Permalink
Trades50
Posts: 1144
Incept: 2007-10-30

IL
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
There are banks on every block where I live. They just built a new Chase not too far from me. Just too many of them. Chase wants to be like the McDonalds of banks. That's their theme. On every corner. Seems like McDonalds has a lot more cash than they do.

----------
Labor for the Globalist: World Class means Third World Class.
2009-10-21 12:15:18
Permalink
Taint
Posts: 165
Incept: 2008-12-24
texas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Under what conditions can the Fed impose repos on the MM community? Under what terms? Is it a form of auction? Most MM are already stuffed with MBS and related real estate securities.

2009-10-21 12:22:03
Permalink
127001
Posts: 917
Incept: 2008-05-21
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Just like some clarification on whether or not I understand this correctly.

On a repo agreement, the fed provides a loan based on collateral - wioth the expectation that the loan is repaid with interest.

On a reverse repo, the fed has the primary dealers take an asset and provide reserves back to the fed. at the end of the term, the fed receives the asset back and the primary dealer receives interest.

The mechanism allows the manamgenet of cash in the system, liquidity or slosh if you will.

The banks alledgely have some 690billion on reserve with the fed if you believe NBAR reports from the fed. If you belive balance sheets from the big banks, they are flush with "cash" as well.

However, the reverse repo was a failure and the primary dealer network was unable or unwilling to take those assets back.

Only two explainaiotns.
1) they are broke and the numbers are a lie.
2) they know how bad that collateral is and want no part of touching them

-- This leaves with a few possibilities
Why does the fed need to remove liquidity? If it is just to reduce inflationary pressure they probably have some wiggle room politically.

If they have to appease foreign creditors, less so.

If it is related to the treasury pulling funds - as noted here a few weeks back, even less so.

- If the banks wil not provide the reserves back to the fed, there are a few places to get it. money markets being the number one target. They just recently, like just now lost their government backing guarantee. They can either force MMF managers to buy crap assets to drain liquidity, or they can start a panic in equities and force MMF's to break the buck causing a huge flight to safety. Either way they get cash.

--
I am not a banker, but this is how I interpreted this data. Does anyone see any problems with my understanding of it?

2009-10-21 12:23:55
Permalink
Bananamerican
Posts: 853
Incept: 2009-05-28
Anytown U.S.A.
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Ok, thanks for the xtra bits dudes....polluting MM funds sounds like a "no good very bad" idea.....

----------
This is not capitalism. This is not American. This is crime.
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks." Lord Acton
2009-10-21 12:24:36
Permalink
Mooreupp
Posts: 140
Incept: 2007-10-31

Ohio
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Truly scary. At we reset all of this, we are going to have to find a better way of making sure competent people end up in positions of power.

----------
The Constitution is the law. It is not, and was never meant to be a "living document."
2009-10-21 12:28:35
Permalink
Max2205
Posts: 56
Incept: 2009-03-06
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
They get a credit and the Fed buys 'em back before the credit is due.....as you and zero hedge have posted before.....smoke and mirrors. Enron guys must be feeling pretty good bout now


2009-10-21 12:32:09
Permalink
Jstanley01
Posts: 2574
Incept: 2008-07-30
A True American Patriot!
San Antonio, Texas
Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Tickerguy wrote..
Are people really this dumb over at The Fed?

It appears so, and begs the question - how big of a disaster are we about to undergo?
I'm hoping and praying: Big enough to FORCE an end to the 'bezzle, but not so big that our country gets sucked into a black hole.

Say, the Allied Expeditionary Forces at the Battle of Normandy instead of the German Ninth Army at the Battle of Stalingrad. Hedgerow country was a bitch, but not nearly as bad as freezing to death in the snow as a prisoner of war.

Hello? God? We are in dire need of a "not too hot, not too cold, just right" down here.


----------
...so in short, my fellow Texans, we must secede. "For the children..." --Me

Last modified: 2009-10-21 12:58:55 by jstanley01

2009-10-21 12:56:46
Permalink
Vmooper
Posts: 1189
Incept: 2007-11-30

Bailout ville
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
When oil hits $100/bbl and they close out their oil positions they will have a lot more cash. Just a blip.

----------
"If you don't know where you are going, speeding up is not the answer." -Jeff Macke
"If you bail out everyone, nobody gets bailed out." -Jeff Macke
"Welcome to Crazytown, population you and me baby." -Jeff Macke
2009-10-21 13:04:11
Permalink
Arw
Posts: 68
Incept: 2009-03-02
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Anyway to cull an 8K to determine how much $$$ JPM, for example, has in repo's with the fed?

2009-10-21 13:14:38
Permalink
Lastchance
Posts: 1132
Incept: 2008-11-19
Las Vegas
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
"It appears so, and begs the question - how big of a disaster are we about to undergo?"

Well, we are already in a disaster. Genesis, when you say banks are insolvent, that is spot on. The FDIC has their so-called list. If they seize the whole list on one day, the system as we know it will collapse into chaos.

Now as to how big of a disaster, I still think big enough to bankrupt political subdivisions. But maybe that is a good thing, because they are no longer needed. It would seem that since the business models of many states, counties, and cities are being proven to be flawed, the management staff should be fired for cause.


----------
"We don't quit. I don't quit" President Obama 1/27/10

Man, I would to have him in one of our poker games.
2009-10-21 13:28:39
Permalink
Cjworkman
Posts: 5615
Incept: 2007-08-22

Online
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
33:1... hahahahahha..

that would be about halfway to blowing up Bear Sterns style.

and considering they lost almost half their cash in the last YEAR...

they have less than 12 months.

----------
Ben is going to create an equity bubble from excess liquidity that tops at 1200... and bottoms at 300. A bubble inside of bearish economic conditions, so that it never reaches new market highs and crashes far below the lows. - me
2009-10-21 13:31:48
Permalink
Arkady
Posts: 123
Incept: 2009-10-19
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
I actually never understood the zombie bank notion. Supposedly the banks are insolvent, but at one point they were flush with reserves and just unwilling to lend until they figured out the full situation of the subprime market.

Now this news comes out suggests that a reverse repo failed, meaning the banks are NOT flushed with cash? Which one is it...

2009-10-21 13:32:56
Permalink
Jnojr
Posts: 555
Incept: 2008-09-18

San Diego, CA.
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Quote:
Under what conditions can the Fed impose repos on the MM community? Under what terms?


This.

Given the abysmal rate of return on my MM, I just transferred most of that money back to my credit union, where I'll still get an abysmal rate of return but at least the hope of some recovery from NCUA

2009-10-21 13:45:15
Permalink
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel Logout
Showing Page 1 of 3  First123Last

AKCS V12.1 Copyright 1993-2010 Karl Denninger. All Rights Reserved
Email the AKCS Owner